Independent contractors aren’t employees for wage and hour purposes — no payroll taxes withheld, no workers’ compensation coverage, no state wage-and-hour protections. California draws that line strictly, and getting it wrong carries real financial exposure. For a church specifically, there’s an added wrinkle worth understanding before applying the general rule to every worker: clergy are governed by an entirely separate classification framework.
The ABC Test for Independent Contractors
California’s default rule, from the Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court and later codified in Assembly Bill 5 (with exemptions added by AB 2257), treats a worker as an employee unless the hiring entity proves all three prongs of the “ABC test”: (A) the worker is free from the hiring entity’s control and direction, both under the contract and in actual practice; (B) the worker performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade or business of the same nature as the work performed. All three have to be true.
A written independent contractor agreement, or issuing a 1099 instead of a W-2, doesn’t establish independent contractor status on its own — the actual working relationship controls, not the label the parties put on it.
Why Misclassifying Independent Contractors Is Expensive
If a worker is actually an employee under the ABC test, California employment law applies in full regardless of how the church has been treating or paying them: income tax withholding, workers’ compensation coverage, unemployment insurance, state disability insurance, wage-and-hour rules including overtime, and mandated benefits like sick leave. The California Labor Code separately prohibits knowingly and voluntarily misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor, with civil penalties ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 per violation — on top of whatever back pay, benefits, and tax liability the misclassification itself creates.
Clergy Are a Separate Category, Not Independent Contractors
Ordained clergy performing ministerial duties don’t fit neatly into either the employee or independent contractor box — they have what the IRS calls dual tax status. For federal income tax purposes, a minister employed by a congregation is treated as a common-law employee and receives a W-2. But for Social Security and Medicare, clergy are treated as self-employed under the Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) rather than the standard FICA system that applies to lay employees — the church doesn’t withhold or match Social Security and Medicare taxes for a minister the way it would for any other staff member, and the minister pays the full 15.3% self-employment rate directly.
This dual status is specific to ordained clergy performing ministerial functions; it isn’t a workaround for classifying other church staff or contract workers, who are still evaluated under the ordinary ABC test like any other business’s workers.
Independent Contractors Church Roles Often Get Wrong
The ABC test’s second prong — whether the work falls outside the church’s usual course of business — is where churches most often misjudge things. A guest speaker or visiting musician engaged for a single event is a more defensible independent contractor. A part-time worship leader who plays every week, is scheduled by staff, and uses the church’s equipment on the church’s schedule looks much more like an employee under the actual test, regardless of what any contract calls them.
The same applies to regular administrative help, ongoing custodial work, or anyone whose role functions like a recurring staff position even if it’s called a contract role. Some job categories have specific statutory exemptions from the ABC test under AB 5 and AB 2257, evaluated instead under the older Borello standard — but qualifying for those exemptions has its own requirements and isn’t automatic just because a role fits a listed category.
Related Articles
Church Officer and Director Liability
Disclaimer: Every situation is different and particular facts may vary thereby changing or altering a possible course of action or conclusion. The information contained herein is intended to be general in nature as laws vary between federal, state, counties, and municipalities and therefore may not apply to any given matter. This information is not intended to be legal advice or relied upon as a legal opinion, course of action, accounting, tax or other professional service. You should consult the proper legal or professional advisor knowledgeable in the area that pertains to your particular situation.
